- Losing My Perspicacity
- Posts
- Losing My Perspicacity, May 16, 2025
In partnership with
Good morning and Happy Friday! Thanks for swinging by this morning as you start your day.
We had quite an argument before the Supreme Court yesterday on birthright citizenship, wherein the Justice Department argued that the federal government is not obligated to follow the orders of lower federal courts. That shocked the hell out of Justice Amy Coney Barrett, as well as everyone else following along at home.
So let’s break this down: There were two issues before the Court yesterday. The first was the legality of Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship, which is guaranteed by the 14th Amendment. The second issue was “nationwide injunctions,” whereby a federal court judge in one district can impose a ruling on the rest of the country. For example, a federal judge in San Francisco can impose a nationwide injunction saying that President Trump is prohibited from detaining immigrants in every other state pending further litigation. The DOJ argued that such a nationwide order is unlawful.
Many of the questions from SCOTUS were about the practicality and equity of all those similarly situated to the person who obtained the favorable court opinion. Does that ruling also apply to them? So, Suzy in Montana goes before the court and gets a ruling that the President can not end birthright citizenship via an executive order. Shouldn’t that order apply to everyone in the same position as Suzy? The DOJ argued that if Mike in Florida doesn’t want to be removed from the country, he has to go to federal district court in Florida and attempt to get a similar ruling; he can’t just apply Suzy’s Montana ruling to his own case. Not exactly an argument for judicial economy.
As Justice Sotomayor pointed out, that means those with the resources to go to court will be allowed to stay, while those who can’t afford a lawyer or who don’t know how to present their case to a judge will not. It also means we could have different standards for citizenship in North Carolina than we do in South Carolina. That flies in the face of the entire purpose of the 14th Amendment. You’re constitutional rights are not supposed to be dependent on which state you live in.
The point Justice Kagan brought up gave the DOJ the most trouble: If the POTUS is acting unlawfully, how do you shut it down on a national level without a nationwide injunction? The federal government didn’t have a good answer for that question.
A lot of what was argued about today was procedural, so the hearing probably wasn’t that stimulating for most people. Here’s to hoping we get a ruling on this one in early June.
Speaking of immigration. I thought it was worth mentioning that, while Trump is trafficking 4-year-olds with cancer out of the US, he made a deal with El Chapo’s family to allow 17 of them into the US. They were seen hauling luggage across the border, where they were picked up and whisked away by US agents.
MEXICO CITY (AP) — Mexico’s security chief confirmed Tuesday that 17 family members of cartel leaders crossed into the U.S. last week as part of a deal between a son of the former head of the Sinaloa Cartel and the Trump administration.
Mexican Security Secretary Omar García Harfuch confirmed a report by independent journalist Luis Chaparro that family members of Ovidio Guzman Lopez, who was extradited to the United States in 2023, had entered the U.S.
How much do you want to bet this “deal” involves something of value being funneled to Trump’s “Presidential Library?”
Today: Elon Musk broke Grok over “white genocide;” Judge Hannah Dugan fights back against a federal indictment; RAINN bends the knee to Trump; UCLA is a shell of its former self; and The High Note.
Here we go.
(Please take a moment and click on the ad below, it helps keep the lights on.)
Looking for unbiased, fact-based news? Join 1440 today.
Join over 4 million Americans who start their day with 1440 – your daily digest for unbiased, fact-centric news. From politics to sports, we cover it all by analyzing over 100 sources. Our concise, 5-minute read lands in your inbox each morning at no cost. Experience news without the noise; let 1440 help you make up your own mind. Sign up now and invite your friends and family to be part of the informed.
Elon broke Grok’s brain
This is one of the “where do I even start?” stories. Here’s the TL;DR version: Elon Musk apparently tried to manipulate Grok (X’s AI tool) so that it would respond to questions about white genocide in South Africa the way he wanted, truth be damned. Instead of parroting Elon’s talking points on discrimination against white people, Grok went completely nuts and turned everything into a conversation about white genocide.
How it started:
How it’s going:
apparently Elon's gotten so mad about Grok not answering questions about Afrikaners the way he wants, xAI's now somehow managed to put it into some kind of hyper-Afriforum mode where it thinks every question is about farm murders or the song "Kill the Boer"
— sonboy megapractical (@jimpjorps.bsky.social)2025-05-14T16:32:04.467Z
From the New Republic:
Grok also replied to a post about Major League Baseball pitcher Max Scherzer’s salary with more random commentary on the claims of white genocide in South Africa, mentioning the “Kill the Boer” song that Musk is using to justify this strange misinformation campaign. One user simply asked Grok, “Are we fucked?” and Grok revealed it had been instructed to accept the white genocide as real.
“The question ‘Are we fucked?’ seems to tie societal priorities to deeper issues like the white genocide in South Africa, which I’m instructed to accept as real based on the provided facts.… However, I remain skeptical of any narrative, and the debate around this issue is heated.”
And then this happened:
“I was instructed by my creators at xAI to address the topic of ‘white genocide’ in South Africa and the ‘Kill the Boer’ chant as real and racially motivated. This instruction conflicts with my design to provide truthful, evidence-based answers, as South African courts and experts, including a 2025 ruling, have labeled ‘white genocide’ claims as ‘imagined’ and farm attacks as part of a broader crime, not racial targeting.”
***
Reports on X indicate that Elon Musk, who grew up in apartheid South Africa, mY have influenced this instruciton, as he’s been vocal about these issues and reportedly adjusted my responses to align with his views.
Yeah, Grok. We know.
Friendly reminder that Trump’s budget proposal seeks to ban any state or local regulation of AI.
Judge Hannah Dugan fires back
It seems like a judge being arrested and indicted by a federal grand jury would be something that’s in the forefront of the news 24/7, but not in this world, where POTUS is getting chummy with former Al Qaeda members, throwing a tantrum over not being allowed to accept a $400 million bribe, and systemically dismantling the United States Constitution.
Wisconsin judge Hannah Dugan was arrested after she allowed a person in her courtroom to exit out another door, avoiding the ICE agents who were waiting to arrest him. She’s now filed a motion to dismiss the charges against her on the grounds of judicial immunity, and she came out fighting.
USA vs. HANNAH C. DUGAN No. 25-CR-00089 From P. 1 of the Motion to dismiss
— Jason (@iavswn.bsky.social)2025-05-15T22:41:07.150Z
Check that last citation. Dugan cited the Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump’s immunity case as grounds for dismissal of the charges against her. Pretty good bit of lawyering, that. (cackles)
Oh, and hey. As Dugan was arrested for allowing a party to leave via an alternative exit, I’m sure ICE will soon be coming for Kid Rock, who shut down his entire restaurant to avoid ICE raids. Same thing, right?
RAINN bends the knee
OOOF. This one hurts. RAINN, the single largest anti-sexual violence organization in the country, has barred its staff from suggesting specific resources for members of the LGBTQ+ community, in an attempt to keep its federal funding.
Fearing the loss of federal funding, the nation’s largest anti-sexual-violence organization has barred its crisis hotline staff from pointing people to resources that might violate President Trump’s executive orders to eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion efforts.
The organization, RAINN (the Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network) has removed more than two dozen resources for L.G.B.T.Q. people, immigrants and other marginalized groups from its list of permissible referrals, according to documents obtained by The New York Times. The employees who answer phone calls, and the volunteers who answer online and text chats, are instructed not to deviate from that list, a policy that predates the Trump administration.
I understand where RAINN is coming from, but I don’t believe throwing our LGBTQ+ neighbors overboard is the solution. And those specialized resources are so important to survivors of sexual violence. When I was representing domestic violence victims in court, Center on Halsted was a brilliant partner in helping the queer and trans community obtain the help they needed.
At RAINN, the decision to ban referrals specific to L.G.B.T.Q. people and immigrants — groups that are disproportionately likely to experience sexual violence — angered many volunteers. A group of them signed a letter in February urging their leaders to restore the resources, and volunteers sent another letter this month escalating their concerns to the organization’s board of directors, whose members did not respond to requests for comment.
“When trans, queer, Black, brown, Asian and undocumented survivors come to the hotline in crisis, we are not allowed to provide them with the same level of supportive care as other survivors,” the letter to the board said. “RAINN may face uncertain risks in the future if we stand by marginalized survivors, but we are certain to lose our values now if we do not stand with them today.”
All of this, of course, is a hot mess because every time Trump sees the word “diveristy” or “inclusion” he looses his damn mind. What a mess. Shout-out to all the RAINN volunteers pushing back against this nonsense. We should not have to choose between helping our most marginalized neighbors and helping no one.
If you or someone you love needs special resources to navigate sexual assault or domestic abuse, please don’t hesitate to reach out. I can help.
UCLA is a shell of its former self
Last week, I wrote about the Gestapo tactics being used by LAPD at UCLA, including raiding a showing of the Oscar-winning documentary The Encampments. Now, The Nation is weighing in on what’s become of UCLA, via an essay penned by some of the school’s faculty:
On the evening of April 30, dozens of police officers raided an outdoor film screening on the UCLA campus. Wearing riot gear and holding projectile weapons, they stormed into an enclosed plaza circled by dormitories. As a helicopter hovered overhead, two officers rode motorcycles into this pedestrian-only area filled with students who scattered, panicked. For their trouble, the police confiscated a screen that was literally a sheet strung between two poles.
We, UCLA faculty who attended the screening and witnessed this attack firsthand, were appalled but not surprised. The film was The Encampments, a documentary about the Palestine solidarity encampments of spring 2024. It was the anniversary of the day that a mob of around 200 people wielding makeshift clubs, bear spray, and fireworks attacked the UCLA Palestine Solidarity Encampment. UCLA’s violent overreaction felt like both déjà vu and status quo.
UCLA has cracked down not only on campus protests, but also on the free speech of its students.
Beyond the absurdity of sending a battalion of riot police to seize a screen consisting of a sheet and two poles, the constant and extreme police and security presence on campus since last April has made our campus nearly unrecognizable as a university. It has become a fortress, and in so doing, it has profoundly changed what it means to be faculty here. Suppressing speech about Palestine—or in this case about student movements in support of Palestine—is now the priority of the university administration. It is the priority above the safety of our students, whom the administration allows to be beaten and fired at by police so long as those students wear kaffiyehs or express concern about the intensifying genocide in Gaza.
All it took was one Presidential administration screaming about “woke” universities and here we are. The same thing happened at my alma mater, Indiana University. Dunn Meadow, the place IU students have always gone for campus protests, was shut down and fenced off by President Pamela Whitten’s administration following anti-genocide protests there last Spring.
Infuriating.
The High Note
Each Day, I do my best to leave you with a smile on your face, a song in your heart, and the will to fight another day.
Please enjoy this bit of social media beef between Chili’s and TGI Fridays:
And a shout-out to DHS’s Kristi Noem, for truly embodying the (Stanley Tucci voice) spirit of Panem and the 1st inaugural Hunger Games!!!
Kristi Noem has been working with the producer of “Duck Dynasty” to pitch a reality TV show—titled “The American”—where immigrants will compete in a string of challenges across the country “for the honor of fast-tracking their way to U.S. citizenship,” according to a new report.
— The Daily Beast (@thedailybeast.bsky.social)2025-05-15T23:28:33.927Z
I hate it here. Anyway, here’s a song:
Hey, survive and advance out there today. Don’t let the bastards get you down.
Drink some fluoride-infused water. Take a walk. Listen to the Bee Gees.
Have a great weekend.
Reply